HONG KONG — When the Normal Put up Workplace opened on Hong Kong’s waterfront in 1976, an area newspaper predicted that the Modernist-style constructing would “definitely turn into as a lot of a landmark” as its Victorian-era predecessor.
The building — with its white concrete facade, harsh angles and tinted glass — grew to become a fixture of Hong Kong’s downtown. But it surely was by no means added to the town’s register of protected landmarks. Now, with Hong Kong officers below strain to generate income, the practically 12-acre web site, which has been valued at over $5 billion, was put up for sale this month.
Supporters of the constructing are scrambling to put it aside as a result of whoever buys the land beneath would have each proper to tear down the put up workplace.
“Some folks in Hong Kong would possibly suppose it’s only a white field,” Charles Lai, an architect in Hong Kong, a Chinese language territory, mentioned on a fall afternoon outdoors the put up workplace, the place folks have been lined up inside to mail packages.
“However, as a matter of truth, this simplistic aesthetic is strictly the place the worth is,” he added.
In cities throughout Asia, residents and design buffs are rallying to save lots of or doc postwar buildings that officers think about too new, too ugly or too unimportant to guard from demolition. Most of the buildings have been municipal buildings that served as downtown hubs of civic life. The campaigns, in a way, are an try to protect the collective recollections saved inside.
The efforts additionally mirror an aversion to the generic-looking procuring malls and condominiums which were changing Modernist-style buildings throughout city Asia, in addition to the nostalgia of metropolis dwellers who watch their skylines consistently change.
Mr. Lai mentioned the five-story Hong Kong put up workplace constructing, designed by a authorities architect, is attention-grabbing as a result of its kind defines the features carried out inside — a precept of the Modernist motion that was widespread from the 1920s to the 1970s. The flooring for purchasers have loftier ceilings and bigger home windows, for instance, than those for mail-sorting machines.
“These are locations which are a part of folks’s day-to-day life; they don’t essentially should be very fairly to be vital,” Haider Kikabhoy, who leads heritage strolling excursions in Hong Kong, mentioned of the town’s postwar landmarks.
With older buildings, the authorities “are inclined to give attention to the rarity of the structure or how nicely designed the constructing is, or the historic significance,” Mr. Kikabhoy mentioned. “However there are lots of methods to grasp historical past, and social historical past is simply as essential.”
In structure, modernism was expressed by way of “Brutalism” and different kinds that sought to evoke the situations of the machine age and relied closely on concrete as a fabric. The Barbican Center in London, which opened in 1982, is a basic instance of the Brutalist aesthetic — and was as soon as voted the town’s ugliest constructing.
In Asia, modernism influenced the design of landmarks similar to Tokyo’s Hotel Okura, which opened earlier than the town performed host to the 1964 Olympics, and the dramatically curved concrete buildings that the architect Leandro V. Locsin designed throughout the Philippines.
A few of the area’s Modernist buildings grew to become immediately well-known, however others didn’t have a following till lately. The curiosity seems to have stemmed partly from a wider reappraisal of Brutalism in Europe and past, and social media buzz as folks rediscover their uncommon design options.
In some circumstances, buildings from the mid- to late-20th century generate public curiosity exactly as a result of they’re on the cusp of being demolished.
In Thailand, ubiquitous symbols of quirky Modernist design — stand-alone film theaters — have been practically erased. A number of hundred had dotted the panorama throughout their heyday, within the 1980s, mentioned Philip Jablon, an unbiased researcher who wrote a book about them. The final one, La Scala, held its final screening in Bangkok in July, prompting cinema buffs to lament the top of an period.
In Cambodia’s capital, Phnom Penh, a decade-long undertaking to doc dozens of Modernist buildings discovered that almost all had been destroyed or modified amid a wave of building funded by abroad builders, mentioned Pen Sereypagna, a Phnom Penh architect concerned within the research effort.
In a couple of circumstances, curiosity in Modernist buildings has translated into conservation victories.
This summer season, a conglomerate agreed to preserve Hong Kong’s State Theater, a quirky 1952 movie house, as a part of a redevelopment undertaking. (Mr. Kikabhoy, who lobbied for the constructing to be saved, is now a paid advisor for the conglomerate, New World Improvement.)
In Singapore, the City Redevelopment Authority mentioned in October that it will suggest a plan to conserve Golden Mile Advanced — a hulking, mixed-use constructing accomplished in 1973 that the Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas as soon as praised as a “distinctive work” — as a part of a redevelopment of the location on which it sits.
Although not each Modernist constructing in Singapore deserves to be saved, mentioned Karen Tan, the founding father of the native design consultancy, Pocket Tasks, the conservation plan for Golden Mile Advanced is an “precise endorsement of the significance of such buildings to the nation’s social and cultural identification.”
Traditionally, she added, the town state’s mannequin of city improvement has been “biased towards a really tabula rasa, tear-down-and-rebuild form of strategy.”
Hong Kong has sometimes agreed to protect Modernist buildings scattered throughout its downtown. Amongst them are the Police Married Quarters, a 1951 constructing that when housed married police workers members and their households, and The Murray, a 1969 authorities constructing whose tiled grid rests on big white arches.
However saving the General Post Office web site presents new challenges.
Hong Kong’s secretary for improvement, Michael Wong, has referred to as the location “very beneficial and really strategic.”
The location is politically delicate as a result of it lies on the coronary heart of Hong Kong’s waterfront, close to property owned by the Folks’s Liberation Military, at a second when the Chinese language authorities is cracking down on the territory’s pro-democracy motion and imposing a national security law that took impact over the summer season.
Supporters of the constructing count on the client to be a mainland Chinese language developer who will not be inclined to protect a relic of the territory’s British colonial interval, which resulted in 1997.
Katty Regulation, a distinguished advocate for the town’s Modernist structure, mentioned of the put up workplace: “They’re wanting on the cash facet, the ground space they will generate and the way a lot the developer can construct. They’re not wanting on the constructing.”
A planning temporary requires some postal amenities to be included in any new building on the location, however advocates say the prevailing put up workplace itself has value.
They’re interesting to the town’s Antiques Advisory Board to reverse its 2013 determination to exclude buildings in-built 1970 or later from being thought-about for conservation standing. Buildings just like the Normal Put up Workplace, they are saying, may very well be earmarked for “adaptive reuse” in a approach that generates new revenue — simply as The Murray became a luxury hotel and the Police Married Quarters have been reworked right into a warren of upscale boutiques.
Hong Kong’s Improvement Bureau mentioned in a short assertion that the advisory board’s coverage had not modified. So the put up workplace constructing could also be in its twilight.
Mr. Lai, the Hong Kong architect, mentioned he was unsure what to consider the federal government’s stance on the constructing.
“The federal government form of treats this, both deliberately or unintentionally, as one thing that’s replaceable,” he mentioned. “They don’t actually see it as a logo or a landmark, which makes folks suppose: ‘Are you doing that deliberately, to erase colonial historical past, or are you merely not in a position to see the worth?’”